Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:17:10 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cu(1) (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist) Message-ID: <200110262017.f9QKHAY49713@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011026115034.jhb@FreeBSD.org> ; from John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:50:34 PDT." References: <XFMail.011026115034.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Aaaaah! The thot plickens :-) > > > > Do you have a problem with cu being a port and not in the base system? > > > > (ie, a port that gives you _just_ cu with no other UUCP crap?) > > Well, the laziness would imply I'd rather it be there to start with. :) I > usually use this for quick serial consoles. If you changed tip to accept > arbitrary parameters in this manner, that would work, but why not just leave > 'cu'? I never use tip myself, so I'd vote to axe tip if we had to get rid of > one. :) Yeah - no religion, and I'm not sharpening axes yet, but it seems like a helluva waste of space to have all that libuucp crud just so we can keep li'l ole cu(1). I guess my next step is to look at OpenBSD's tip/cu merge. M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110262017.f9QKHAY49713>