Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 08:11:23 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, netch@netch.kiev.ua, Michael Haro <mharo@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/sudo Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20010308081123.B84789@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <20010308083522.G45561@ohm.physics.purdue.edu>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:35:22AM -0500 References: <200102211243.f1LCh0V44891@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010221044535.B63760@FreeBSD.org> <20010308135913.A693@iv.nn.kiev.ua> <20010308083522.G45561@ohm.physics.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gatW/ieO32f1wygP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:35:22AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:59:13PM +0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > > Is it reasonable in any such case, make forced null commit with right > > description? >=20 > No. Yes. Misleading commit messages suck. I hate it when a port commit does a different thing than it says in the commit message when I'm trying to track down a change. Kris --gatW/ieO32f1wygP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6p68rWry0BWjoQKURAgpsAKCaZdhaMojaxuPA13tP/EtctlrPygCdGZfn xXBU6/qNG0Kknf05/2AycVk= =twdi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gatW/ieO32f1wygP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010308081123.B84789>