Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Apr 2000 12:13:20 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        R Joseph Wright <rjoseph@speakeasy.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: smp motherboards/concepts
Message-ID:  <20000406121319.E22104@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004061111070.36652-100000@mammalia.sea>; from rjoseph@speakeasy.org on Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 11:32:53AM -0700
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004061111070.36652-100000@mammalia.sea>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* R Joseph Wright <rjoseph@speakeasy.org> [000406 12:07] wrote:
> I know FreeBSD supports multiple processors, but how many?  What
> motherboard(s) support more than two, for example using a pentium pro?

People have been known to use FreeBSD in quad processor systems.

> 
> Is the concept of SMP similar to beowulf clusters?  I've read a little
> about those, and as I understand, simply clustering many computers together
> does not guarantee a faster system, if the software is not especially
> compiled to handle it.  Is this also true of SMP?  I'm specifically
> thinking of using an SMP system for doing raytracing.

The SMP you get with FreeBSD would be multiple processors in a single
system, unless you can break down your raytracing application into
multiple processes to act on different threads at the same time you
won't see any improvement.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000406121319.E22104>