Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:57:20 +1000 From: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Cc: appleboy.tw@gmail.com, umq@ueo.co.jp, cy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Requests for port updates Message-ID: <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Has bugzilla taken on the role of being the repository for update requests? With gnats, when the synopsis contained port information (eg mail\opendkim ...) the "issue" was routed directly to the maintainer. If there is no auto-routing then how is a maintainer to be alerted to a port request - unless they happen to refer to bugzilla. Mailing freebsd-ports just doesn't seem right... but if it is mail/opendkim - current PORTVERSION is 2.8.3, while version 2.9.2 has been available since April and uses --with-lmdb sysutils/cfengine36 - released today. Modified the VERSION number and built 3.6.0 cleanly. Preliminary testing ok. (also uses lmdb) www/phpbb3 - Changing PORTVERSION=3.0.11 to 3.0.12 and building is ok too. Dewayne.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53A26DB0.6060306>