Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:12:28 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> Cc: appleboy.tw@gmail.com, umq@ueo.co.jp, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>, cy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Requests for port updates Message-ID: <201406190512.s5J5CSlV024532@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> of "Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:57:20 %2B1000." <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au>, Dewayne Geraghty writes: > Has bugzilla taken on the role of being the repository for update > requests? With gnats, when the synopsis contained port information (eg > mail\opendkim ...) the "issue" was routed directly to the maintainer. > If there is no auto-routing then how is a maintainer to be alerted to a > port request - unless they happen to refer to bugzilla. > > Mailing freebsd-ports just doesn't seem right... but if it is > > mail/opendkim - current PORTVERSION is 2.8.3, while version 2.9.2 has > been available since April and uses --with-lmdb > sysutils/cfengine36 - released today. Modified the VERSION number and > built 3.6.0 cleanly. Preliminary testing ok. (also uses lmdb) > www/phpbb3 - Changing PORTVERSION=3.0.11 to 3.0.12 and building is ok too. Cfengine was updated about five hours ago. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201406190512.s5J5CSlV024532>