Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:49:07 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Heesakkers <freebsd@heesakkers.info> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Still can't build libreoffice Message-ID: <20111004214907.GD19540@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <a7ff0ed9cd941641538b29864571f60f@huis.heesakkers.info> References: <4E8818EF.10204@FreeBSD.org> <20111002195436.GA19540@azathoth.lan> <0619d7e3d76e8fee0fb5bcc76c4a9ff8@huis.heesakkers.info> <4E8A871E.6030007@FreeBSD.org> <a7ff0ed9cd941641538b29864571f60f@huis.heesakkers.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6WlEvdN9Dv0WHSBl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:12:31PM +0200, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > On 04.10.2011 06:10, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 10/03/2011 07:32, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > > > >> I have the same problem (9.0 BETA3 amd64) > >> > >> When I set libreoffice's DEBUG option, the build (`make`) does=20 > >> complete. > > > > Thanks, that gave me some new places to look. I had the following in > > make.conf: > > > > CFLAGS+=3D -g > > DEBUG_FLAGS+=3D -g > > > > Commenting those out avoids the cppunittest error, but now it fails=20 > > in > > various random locations depending on the options I choose. I still=20 > > have > > the following in make.conf in case that's relevant: > > > > (...) > > > > I tried enabling the DEBUG option and that just caused it to fail > > somewhere else. > > >=20 > That makes no sense to me, as enabling DEBUG for libreoffice lets me > complete the build. >=20 > I moved my entire portstree to /home and was able to build, install, > package and run a debug build of libreoffice (30G to build, 1.2G as a=20 > package) >=20 > I have nothing in make.conf but perl / ruby / python version=20 > declarations, > LOCALIZED_LANG=3Dnl and now of course PORTSDIR=3Dhome/ports >=20 > Running a debug build is far from ideal, so I'm still looking for a=20 > solution. > Comparing my script-output with Nikolov's tb-log I note that Nikolov: > - has more dependencies > - uses nawk instead of gawk > - uses tar instead of gtar > - uses OSVERSION=3D900039 instead of OSVERSION=3D900044 > - uses gtk instead of kde4 VCLplug > - - (I also get a "configure: WARNING: unrecognized options:=20 > --with-qt-includes, --with-qt-libraries, --with-extra-libs,=20 > --with-extra-includes") > - uses en-US instead of nl (I have LOCALIZED_LANG=3Dnl in make.conf) > - has 1 instead of 2 processors to use >=20 > This last one seems interesting to me, looking futher I notice that=20 > modules are > delivered in a different order. Comparing the three builds, all three=20 > have a > different order, i.e.: testautomation is delivered first in Nikolov's=20 > build and > my DEBUG build, but in my failing non-DEBUG build it gets delivered=20 > third. >=20 > Is the order in which modules are delivered relevant? >=20 > Can I force my build process to run on one processor to see if this=20 > makes a > difference? >=20 add --with-num-cpus=3D1 and --with-max-jobs=3D1 to the configure args. regards, Bapt --6WlEvdN9Dv0WHSBl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6Lf1MACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyN1wCgmLlzUD2gd0w8cUp6YgDTIajC xUkAn3a9x07NCecWyIcqLqrl+MaVN+2p =Di+X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6WlEvdN9Dv0WHSBl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111004214907.GD19540>