Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:32:54 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120 Message-ID: <5105AB16.2000607@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <201301272007.30682.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <5105527F.3010708@m5p.com> <201301271915.47712.hselasky@c2i.net> <510570C1.1060607@m5p.com> <201301272007.30682.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/27/13 14:07, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Sunday 27 January 2013 19:24:01 George Mitchell wrote: >> On 01/27/13 13:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't see any errors in the usbdump trace you sent. So we can at least >>> rule that out. >>> >>> Hint: You can filter traffic using the -f option for usbdump. >>> >>> What does: >>> >>> usbconfig dump_device_desc dump_curr_config_desc >>> >>> output? Can you also get same output from working system? >>> >>> --HPS >> >> Attachment 1 from Raspberry Pi. >> Attachment 2 from 9.1-RELEASE on amd64. -- George > > Hi, > > These look identical. I suspect it is a problem to allocate memory for the USB > transfers. I need output when hw.usb.ulpt.debug=15 to say exactly. Could you > ask the provider of the binaries to compile having USB_DEBUG set, also for the > modules. > > --HPS > I'm working on getting a debug build ... Thanks for your help so far. I notice that there seem to be only trivial differences between the 9.1 release ulpt and the 10.0 current ulpt driver. -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5105AB16.2000607>