Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:42:54 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/quake2lnx Makefile distinfo pkg-message pkg-plist ports/games/quake2lnx/files extra-patch-src_rogue_g__local.h extra-patch-src_rogue_q__shared.c extra-patch-src_xatrix_q__shared.c patch-Makefile patch-src::game::g_phys.c patch-src::linux::gl_glx.c patch-src::linux::rw_in_svgalib.c ... Message-ID: <1132234974.79514.12.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20051117133108.GA29488@FreeBSD.org> References: <200511171051.jAHApSWX074582@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051117133108.GA29488@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-Ue9NTiecqkEKSsrVALuC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alexey Dokuchaev p=ED=B9e v =E8t 17. 11. 2005 v 13:31 +0000:
> > PR: ports/87181
> > Submitted by: Alejandro Pulver <alejandro@varnet.biz>
> > Approved by: maintainer timeout
>=20
> Edwin,
>=20
> I wish I could say "thanks" for work you've done, but I would appreciate
> private confirmation mail even in case of "maintainer timeout". This is
> a complicated port, and such a change is potentially harmful due to its
> massiveness. Commits like this should probably be done per-piece fashion=
,
> otherwise it's really hard to check if nothing got broken. Not to
> mention that I actually disagree on the number of changes suggested in
> the PR (and committed by you).
>=20
> I'm not asking for a backout, in fact I realize how annoying it can be
> when PR hangs in "open" state for a month(s), and I would have probably
> needed to change PR state to something like "working on it, please be
> patient", however, I must say I got somewhat frustrated to have to fix
> all those things that I don't like WRT this commit.
So why have you not handled the PR yourself? Is 36 days really not
enough to sort out a single port PR?
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Just because you're an angel doesn't mean you have to be a fool.
--=-Ue9NTiecqkEKSsrVALuC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDfIjentdYP8FOsoIRAjdaAKCn+FZxzistnrFk7gtkOlj8hcLzuACaAmnP
TF2VPb0kJw3scBVexlW0e9s=
=olng
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Ue9NTiecqkEKSsrVALuC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1132234974.79514.12.camel>