Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:37:48 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: resolver change? Message-ID: <86myqrxaw3.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20080127184656.B60477@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Sun\, 27 Jan 2008 18\:48\:25 %2B0000 \(GMT\)") References: <86d4rn1kln.fsf@ds4.des.no> <ygeejc3ck1z.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <86sl0jywii.fsf@ds4.des.no> <yged4rncetu.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <86abmryun9.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080127184656.B60477@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > A casual glance suggests no pertinent changes in that timeframe -- > however, were you just updating your kernel, or also userspace, and in > particular, libc? No, this is the weird thing. I'm starting to think I'm imagining it all... But this *definitely* worked correctly on January 13, and *definitely* didn't work correctly on January 21, nor does it work correctly today. > What happens if you back out getaddrinfo.c:1.86: I've been running with that version of getaddrinfo.c since long before it stopped working. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86myqrxaw3.fsf>