Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:09:29 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Carlo Strub <cs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r301130 - head/dns/zkt [ID#2012071909000066] Message-ID: <20120719100929.GA80680@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1342682908.443596.686173085.47077.2@c-st.net> References: <20120719010925.GA18083@FreeBSD.org> <1342682908.443596.686173085.47077.2@c-st.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:28:28AM +0200, Carlo Strub wrote: > 07/19/2012 03:10 - Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:39:17PM +0000, Carlo Strub wrote: > > > --- head/dns/zkt/Makefile Wed Jul 18 21:03:43 2012 (r301129) > > > +++ head/dns/zkt/Makefile Wed Jul 18 21:39:17 2012 (r301130) > > > @@ -1,27 +1,30 @@ > > > # New ports collection makefile for: zkt > > > # Date created: 2008-08-06 > > > -# Whom: Frank Behrens <frank+ports@ilse.behrens.de> > > > +# Whom: Frank Behrens > > > > This header should not be touched. It reflect the reality when port was > > first added, and should normally be made more accurate, not less (e.g. by > > adding previously omitted address). > > If I remember correctly, there was an effort made a few years ago to > remove all the mail addresses in the headers to not let users bother port > originators but only maintainers if there was a problem. Is that not the > right approach anymore? I am open for discussion. I recall someone mentioned this, yes, but 1) this idea is stupid: instead of removing bits of historical evidence, we should educate our users where to look for correct maintainer address; 2) however, if we standardize Makefile header in some way, I will happily follow the standard; 3) I understand your rationale and not particularly against your commit; 4) I am also open for a discussion. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120719100929.GA80680>