Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:00:47 +0400 From: Igor Roboul <igor@raduga.sochi.net> To: richard@brainstorm.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: GNUstep problem SOLVED Message-ID: <20000914160047.B31439@linux.rainbow> In-Reply-To: <10009140915.AA00380@tiptree.brainstorm.co.uk>; from richard@brainstorm.co.uk on Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:15:58AM %2B0100 References: <20000910182158.A8159@linux.rainbow> <20000914083141.A22658@linux.rainbow> <10009140915.AA00380@tiptree.brainstorm.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:15:58AM +0100, richard@brainstorm.co.uk wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:31:41 +0400, igor@raduga.sochi.net wrote: > > Is this a bug in the gdomap code, or does FreeBSD lack a fully working > loopback interface? No, it is not bug in both. gdomap dont use loopback. This is correct way gdomap works. But on Linux, there is 'dummy' interface which is something like loopback but is not loopback. It just placeholder for IP address. Enabling 'dummy' interface in kernel adds 0 bytes to size :-) But it works for GNUstep as real interface. This is why I could use GNUstep on Linux (but before I added dummy, I could not use GNUstep). I had not connected these two events :-( -- Igor Roboul, Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga", Sochi, Russia http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000914160047.B31439>