Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:04:09 -0400 From: "John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell" <johnandsara2@cox.net> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/188190: mail/mutt 1.5.23 needs to support POP, IMAP, SMTP over SSL Message-ID: <53470749.8040905@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <kxnz1n00f2X408g01xo0Z5> References: <kxnz1n00f2X408g01xo0Z5>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
linimon@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Old Synopsis: Mutt 1.5.23 needs to support POP, IMAP, SMTP over SSL > New Synopsis: mail/mutt 1.5.23 needs to support POP, IMAP, SMTP over SSL > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-ports-bugs > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 2 09:47:38 UTC 2014 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > ports PR. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188190 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > is nice if it doesn't break the old way of using mutt for people who use it should be an add on or supp. pkg is nice if "security" isn't integrated in a way it becomes incompatible with normal security. for example: if i don't use pam the security should still work , and i shouldn't be forced to use or run kind of security hack, like ssh it's definitely a wish not need is that right ? sounds nice, good luck, of course the support is already in other apps
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53470749.8040905>