Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:41:09 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Rob <rob2@pythonemproject.com> Cc: amd-list <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: newby AMD-64 port compiling questions Message-ID: <20040930004109.GA31644@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <415B54C5.6050807@pythonemproject.com> References: <415B54C5.6050807@pythonemproject.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:35:17PM -0700, Rob wrote: > I know on Windoze, i386 and 64 bit applications are supposed to coexist. >=20 > Is this true on FreeBSD? You can run 32-bit and 64-bit applications on the same machine. > If so, is the port collection set up so that known problem 64bit ports=20 > only compile under i386? No. Our goal is to primairly support native applictions without too much mixing. > How do I know whether a port or binary is i386 or 64 bit? with the port= =20 > I suppose the Makefile would tell me >=20 > Is there a switch that will allow me to choose either i386 or 64 bit=20 > when compiling a port? This might be a useful thing, but it isn't something we support today. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBW1YkXY6L6fI4GtQRAgFIAKDPJUUshbxHrTMasr+GcEqTKFmwmQCggmEq l7ThccMWQbJxuupcIvfI3p0= =tMNH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040930004109.GA31644>