Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:54:57 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does anyone use nscd? Message-ID: <051853CE-03EC-4EEC-A5AC-C380131B28E4@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20111004160043.GA16034@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <20111004160043.GA16034@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/10/2011, at 2:30, Michel Talon wrote: > Des wrote: >> Does anyone actually use nscd? >=20 > I am using it since a lot of time. I have not experienced annoying = bugs > in all that time. The last time i have been hit is when installing = some > new softs which require adding some user and some group with pw. Of > course this doesn't work well with caching these data, and i had > completely forgotten i was using a cache. This is very perplexing. >=20 In my experience ncsd seems to cache negative hits forever, regardless = of the setting for negative-time-to-live. If I am installing ports which create a new user or group I have to = restart nscd. I also find if openldap dies (not infrequent) I have to = restart nscd after restarting openldap.. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?051853CE-03EC-4EEC-A5AC-C380131B28E4>