Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:22 -0500 From: Bruce Campbell <bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow - traced to getpwnam maybe ? Message-ID: <1104941302.41dc10f6a1e9b@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <1104932867.41dbf003405b1@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104892047.41db508f4c7f4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050105045329.GA77072@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104932867.41dbf003405b1@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Bruce Campbell <bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca>:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:27:27PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > I wrote a small program:
> > >
> > > #include <sys/types.h>
> > > #include <pwd.h>
> > >
> > > main( int argc, char *argv[] )
> > > {
> > > getpwuid( 13076 );
> > > }
> > >
> > > and ran it under truss on 5.x and it generated 178,711 lines of output.
> > > (the bulk of which is those lseek/read calls as above)
It looks like the overhaul of getpwent Apr/2003 to make it thread safe:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c
may be the problem.
I've tested the dbm_fetch function independently on a large
file, and it is fine.
I've opened a bug report, and plan to build a replacement 4.x
mail server, as the most deterministic path to restoring
adequate e-mail service to our users.
Can anyone suggest a workaround ?
--
Bruce Campbell
Engineering Computing
CPH-2374B
University of Waterloo
(519)888-4567 ext 5889
----------------------------------------
This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1104941302.41dc10f6a1e9b>