Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:34:24 -0500 From: Hiten Pandya <hiten@unixdaemons.com> To: Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.cz> Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VLAN v.s. NIC with VLAN hardware support bug. Message-ID: <20021221233424.GA23657@unixdaemons.com> In-Reply-To: <3E03C706.5060508@obluda.cz> References: <3E038A1A.6070203@obluda.cz> <3E03A86C.6D15F650@newsguy.com> <3E03C706.5060508@obluda.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 02:42:30AM +0100, Dan Lukes wrote the words in effect of: > IFAIK no. I tried it also during debug of my problem. But it doesn't > support 1000BaseTX, so it isn't decision for my purpose. > > The only cards with HW vlan support on STABLE are nge, bge, txp, gx, > em, ti (ti aren't affected by reported bug as it strips the priority > bits at driver level). Dan, I believe you submitted a PR about this [1], what does patch try to solve, regarding VLAN hardware support? [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/46405 Cheers. -- Hiten Pandya (hiten@unixdaemons.com, hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org) http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021221233424.GA23657>