Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:43:51 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ernst de Haan <ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Openoffice-1.1 depends on 5 different jdks Message-ID: <20040325074351.GA63609@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200403250820.15128.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> References: <20040324194155.GA53330@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040324205331.GA6028@phantom.cris.net> <20040324230327.GA56450@xor.obsecurity.org> <200403250820.15128.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:20:15AM +0100, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Kris, >=20 > > This does hilight the bsd.java.mk problem that old versions of the jdk > > are used by default by the USE_JAVA=3D1.2+ construction, which defaults > > to the oldest possible jdk (1.2) instead of the newest stable version. >=20 > When newer JDK's become more stable than the old ones _and_ have not too= =20 > many dependencies, then the newer JDK's are moved up the preference list. Isn't at least 1.3 considered "stable"? 1.2 is unbuildable as a package because it eventually depends on the FORBIDDEN compat3x. Kris --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAYo23Wry0BWjoQKURAsWCAKCBDnEHgyv8EOoprhrGF+3ldNzFMgCg6Tfa WkmVT02DadMXnoqM827elOM= =bf+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040325074351.GA63609>