Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:24:11 -0500 From: "Jim Flowers" <jflowers@ezo.net> To: "David Raistrick" <drais@wow.atlasta.net> Cc: <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>, <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Infrastructure Design with Portmasters and FreeBSD/Zebra (long) Message-ID: <003d01c1890e$2e49cae0$22b197ce@ezo.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112191337140.45427-100000@wow.atlasta.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yeah, I think it's a pretty common practice. We have actually used 192.168 addresses for numbered point-to-point links without any problems but then changed them for simpler troubleshooting. That was with static routes before we had implemented ospf routing and before the latest crush of DOS and intrusion attacks. I didn't want to jump off the deep end on doing this systemwide without finding out what other people are doing. There have been a number of good suggestions. Thanks for the info. Jim Flowers - EZNets, Inc. <jflowers@ezo.net> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Raistrick" <drais@wow.atlasta.net> To: "Blake Crosby" <dev@samurai.com> Cc: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com>; "Jim Flowers" <jflowers@ezo.net>; <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>; <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:38 PM Subject: RE: Infrastructure Design with Portmasters and FreeBSD/Zebra (long) > On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Blake Crosby wrote: > > > Hmm > > > > I am pretty sure the rogers@home network here uses 10/8 network space for > > their internal routing: > > Bellsouth.net uses 172.16-31 addresses for their between-router networks, > as well. > > ....david > > --- > david raistrick (no longer deep in the south georgia woods) > drais@atlasta.net http://www.expita.com/nomime.html > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003d01c1890e$2e49cae0$22b197ce>