Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 02 May 2001 09:43:11 +0900
From:      itojun@iijlab.net
To:        snap-users@kame.net
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au, altq@csl.sony.co.jp
Subject:   Re: (KAME-snap 4591) Re: [altq 806] The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing together ... 
Message-ID:  <5379.988764191@itojun.org>
In-Reply-To: gunther's message of Tue, 01 May 2001 17:45:17 GMT. <3AEEF62D.8E5D74D8@aurora.regenstrief.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Yes, this makes your lives very difficult, I understand. However,
>I also understand that you kind of prefer working with IPFILTER
>because IPFILTER is available for all *BSDs regardless of what
>other filtering stuff is also available for those. Therefore, I
>have migrated to IPFILTER and I have encouraged others to do the
>same so that you guys can concentrate on IPFILTER and don't have
>to bother with IPFW etc.

	i (or we) have never picked a single preferred filtering code for us,
	i guess.

itojun

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5379.988764191>