Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:19:54 -0800 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Da Rock <rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Old user can't log in Message-ID: <18B3B929-DB30-4274-B698-D09B329EBF4F@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <1234506087.13067.123.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <325E4EC8-BD2B-45C1-978C-4922D16D3A94@identry.com> <9391FD2D-59ED-455A-8C87-2854C7EF1E52@mac.com> <ECDF6933-47F6-4D67-AC5C-5E149590D971@identry.com> <1234498626.13067.96.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <470E75B0-C7E9-4F05-A112-62DF01F1EA1D@mac.com> <1234500741.13067.111.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <F8CE7DF3-3991-4AB1-9AEA-FB667A82F01C@mac.com> <1234506087.13067.123.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 12, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Da Rock wrote: > So you're talking in terms of the FS only? Nope. A filesystem might have ACL capability available in it's specification, but without kernel and userland support, that capability isn't accessible or meaningful. > I thought you said the kernel wasn't capable? Yes, I said that the kernel has a compile-time limit as to how many groups are supported per user. > I'll have to look into this a more thoroughly, I'm > intrigued to say the least. Not to say I'll ever probably use it, > but it > does present a limitation. Sure. -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18B3B929-DB30-4274-B698-D09B329EBF4F>