Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:30:06 +1100 From: Dima Panov <fluffy@ael.ru> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Cc: Dino Vliet <dino_vliet@yahoo.com>, Kevin Downey <redchin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: libjvm.so not found on amd64 system with freebsd 7 Message-ID: <200809081230.08366.fluffy@ael.ru> In-Reply-To: <1d3ed48c0809071713hece1847x2980e88d0e9fb54d@mail.gmail.com> References: <833002.54826.qm@web51109.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <1d3ed48c0809071713hece1847x2980e88d0e9fb54d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 September 2008, Kevin Downey wrote: > > [root@dual /usr/ports/math]# ldd > > /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so > > /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so: > > Unexpected inconsistency: dependency libjvm.so not found > > /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so: exit status 1 > I wonder if this is related to the dual core + procfs java issues: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2008-March/007346.html > > I forget exactly, but when java sees /proc it tries to use some > special file /proc/curfile or something like that, which, uh, on dual > core doesn't work reliably. Not only dualcore, but if jdk/jre placed on nullfs/unionfs. Seems to be affected any PSEUDOFS-based filesystems and broken procfs realization (any binary executed from pseudo-filesystem have broken info in their details, shows only PID info; cmdline, file symlink, status and other resources is unavailable). May be affected if /usr/local is mount-point to another physical partition. -- Дмитрий А. Панов Администратор ЛВС Государственная Академия Экономики и Права Хабаровск, Россия
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809081230.08366.fluffy>