Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:18:28 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount(8) mount_union(8) and the slippery wet floor... Message-ID: <20020905111828.GB9887@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20020905091754.GE10717@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020904132723.00bc28e8@mail.lusidor.nu> <20020904124832.GA15994@submonkey.net> <44y9ahecn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20020905091754.GE10717@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:17:55AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com / 2002-09-04 16:13:53 -0400: > > Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> writes: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:46:42PM +0200, Jimmy Lantz wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > My question is: > > > > Is the mount union mentioned in MOUNT(8) also affected by the > > > > slippery wet floor in MOUNT_UNION(8)?? > > > > Or can I safely use the mount with the option union? > > > > > > They are the same thing. > > > > For the record, they are *not* the same thing. > > could you elaborate? Yes, please do. Ceri -- you can't see when light's so strong you can't see when light is gone To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020905111828.GB9887>