Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 17:35:29 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Farshidoo <farshidoo@yahoo.com>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is LFS operational? Message-ID: <19981123173529.Q24412@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <19981123084020.26824.rocketmail@send105.yahoomail.com>; from Farshidoo on Mon, Nov 23, 1998 at 12:40:20AM -0800 References: <19981123084020.26824.rocketmail@send105.yahoomail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 23, 1998 at 12:40:20AM -0800, Farshidoo wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I installed FreeBSD on my computer and tried to use its LFS. > I created a file system by newlfs and mounted it by mount_lfs > commands. When I tried to touch(1) a file in that file system > it stopped and the process remained in 'D+' state. Then I > noticed that in one of man pages is written that LFS has problem > in FreeBSD. Is it right? LFS is busted in FreeBSD, and was removed in 3.0. This is due to LFS not tracking the VM changes, if I've understood correctly. > What about FFS and its relation with UFS? Is UFS based on FFS? > If yes, what is the difference between them? UFS is a higher level. Different level of abstraction, sort of. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981123173529.Q24412>