Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:51:39 -0600 From: "Samuel J. Greear" <freebsd-hackers@evilcode.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Chris Hodgins <chodgins@cis.strath.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Idea about 'skeleton jail Message-ID: <200503131051.40700.freebsd-hackers@evilcode.net> In-Reply-To: <42342C47.209@cis.strath.ac.uk> References: <1107178792.613.22.camel@spirit> <87d5u33j51.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <42342C47.209@cis.strath.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Not a bad 'idea' at all, although I won't comment on semantics. I had something implemented using fs stacking (in a very hackish way, and I believe it's lost now, so don't ask to see it...) to implement per-jail quota's that seemed to work quite well. Sam > > This might be a very stupid idea but how about a jailfs. Now I don't > know all that much about filesystem design so bear with me. How about > something like this: > <snippay> > > SO the jail filesystem is configured at jail-creation time and uses the > hosts files or jail files depending on the configuration. Might have to > pass the config file into the jail command. > > As I said I am not an expert. Mabye one of the experts could let me > know what they think? > > Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503131051.40700.freebsd-hackers>