Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 13:32:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204735] [net] Outgoing packets being sent via wrong interface Message-ID: <bug-204735-2472-Y3vnDM5Ffy@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-204735-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-204735-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204735 Daniel Bilik <ddb@neosystem.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People --- Comment #1 from Daniel Bilik <ddb@neosystem.org> --- I think I may have found a culprit - flowtable. When comparing netinet/ip_output.c between 9-stable and 10-stable, I noticed the flowtable call is different. And looking into net/flowtable.c revealed = that it was almost completely rewritten between 9.x and 10.x. Flowtable is not included in GENERIC kernel, but our problematic host runs custom kernel with "options FLOWTABLE" defined (we had this in our kernel f= or 9.x and kept it when upgrading to 10.x). I've just disabled flowtable on the host via sysctl to check whether it helps (though it will take weeks to be sure, because the issue strikes just occasionally). BTW, there are some fixes to flowtable in HEAD, specifically r292978 and r290276, both several months old. The latter was even scheduled to "MFC aft= er 3 days", but it doesn't seem to be applied to 10-STABLE yet. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204735-2472-Y3vnDM5Ffy>