Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:27:59 +0200 From: Johan van Selst <johans@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Cc: FreeBSD ports list <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: texi2html problem Message-ID: <20120709082759.GA46487@mud.stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <4FFA8A8A.7040205@dougbarton.us> References: <4FFA3A36.9050809@dougbarton.us> <20120709073419.GA37825@mud.stack.nl> <4FFA8A8A.7040205@dougbarton.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Doug Barton wrote: > >> It would also be useful if you could make real options out of > >> what you have in the file already. > > Not sure what you mean by this: the options seem real enough. > make config > ===> No options to configure The only relevant options are DOCS and NLS; they were never included in OPTIONS in the past (before I adopted this port). And indeed, many ports don't include DOCS and NLS in their OPTIONS today. My understanding is that most people who want to tweak these specific settings use a system-wide setting anyway. Is there some general policy on whether OPTIONS_DEFINE should be set for DOCS and NLS as well? Regards, Johan --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAk/6lg8ACgkQAEpMHW8nCPTb+AEApym+HSR0pIDuqldrkjLroCRG dq3seFe7e7Tl/yKd6z8BAK8izyCRDrMAsPo8mhcPTrMopdvWZLak/N6BH3u8qcMS =iSKN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120709082759.GA46487>