Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:43:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: h@schmalzbauer.de Subject: Re: ports and -current Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309202038570.19227-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030920.164621.68039520.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de> > Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> writes: > : Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are > > Maybe I missed the reason why FreeBSD needs to be unique wrt threading > programs and not have -pthread... Because -pthread allows selection of one specific threadling library, not multiple. It is also unnecessary since the library is specified as a link option, not a compiler option. In the future, -pthread will be a NOOP, but it suits us now to have it cause an error so that ports that don't honor PTHREAD_LIBS can be found and fixed. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10309202038570.19227-100000>