Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:42:35 +0400 From: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: portupgrade stale dependencies Message-ID: <cb5206420510280342p272c2b20j714e725e9eb314b3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20051028050719.D60E.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <200510271904.17908.ringworm01@gmail.com> <cb5206420510280025h10f96272v4fb381c76aa83d6@mail.gmail.com> <20051028050719.D60E.GERARD@seibercom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/28/05, Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net> wrote: > > Personally, I feel that portmanager does a much better job of updating > without the problems that seem to crop up so often using portupgrade. > I've always been scared off by the comparatively young age of portmanager. Besides, portupgrade comes with a set of useful tools, like cvsweb browser. But the fat ruby dependency and some other things make me want something else. I'd be glad to see a perl-based ports management system. Maybe I'll write one some day :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420510280342p272c2b20j714e725e9eb314b3>