Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:07:02 +0300 From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> To: Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Patch for premake 4.4 beta 5 from premake 4 Message-ID: <53A95BD6.6010708@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53A91FD6.9030205@gmail.com> References: <53A91FD6.9030205@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014-06-24 09:51, Sergei G wrote: > I had to update Premake 4 port (4.3) to 4.4 beta 5 on FreeBSD > 10.0-RELEASE #0. I wanted to wait for the full (non-beta) 4.4 release, but seeing that some projects are already using 4.4-betas, I guess it's time to update the port... > I included patch file with changes applied to Premake 4 port. The > changes consist of: > > 1. updating version and addition of beta version in Makefile > 2. switch to clang compiler in Makefile It's better to use 'cc' instead of 'clang'; this way nothing will break in 8.x and 9.x branches where GCC is still the default. > 3. update of download file signatures > 4. removal of 2 patch files, because the files appear to be obsolete > and I could not figure out the proper fix. Keeping both patch files > resulted in error during premake execution. > > I was successful for my small scope of compiling Box2D, but I observed a > couple of issues with my upgrade. > > 3 regression tests failed (it appears due to at least one missing patch > file): > > [...] > > Once I installed premake I observed that it generated Makefile with gcc > in it, instead of clang. Should switch to clang be applied at premake or > Box2D project level? I'll need to look into that before saying anything definite; I'll report back once I'll do that.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53A95BD6.6010708>