Date: 09 Apr 2003 09:53:30 -0800 From: Jon Reynolds <jonr@destar.net> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbufs exhausted Message-ID: <1049910810.1532.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20030409091527.GA94871@gothmog.gr> References: <1049817201.1588.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20030409034713.GC650@gothmog.gr> <1438.192.168.1.1.1049864071.squirrel@www.destar.net> <20030409091527.GA94871@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 01:15, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2003-04-08 20:54, jonr@destar.net wrote: > > I did as you suggested and both nmbclusters and nmbufs were maxed out, > > well nmbclusters was about 3 clusters shy of maxxing out. I went into > > my /boot/defaults/loader.conf and changed the nmbclusters to =4096 and > > rebooted. Should this setting have been added to the kernel and > > recompiled or is setting it in the loader.conf alright also? > > Should be fine... there's very little difference (if any) between > setting tunables through the loader and compiling them into the kernel > image that you boot. > > - Giorgos Thanks again Girogos! Sometimes we just need a little hand holding. :) -- Jon Reynolds <jonr@destar.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1049910810.1532.32.camel>