Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:31:12 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Ryan Sommers <ryans@gamersimpact.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of /stand Directory Message-ID: <4172AC60.2020405@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4171F702.9020405@gamersimpact.com> References: <4171F702.9020405@gamersimpact.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ryan Sommers wrote: > After a thread on current@ and private discussion following, myself and > the other party were in agreement that /stand serves no purpose after > the initial install. Most of /stand is duplicated in /rescue with the > exception of a few members. This makes the approx. 3mb of space consumed > by /stand wasted space. > > The only post-install dependency on /stand I can find is the diskless rc > script. This script uses /stand/cpio and /stand/gzip for unpacking > template archives to populate memory disks. I have come up with two > solutions that would solve this problem. The first involves /bin/pax and > moving gzip to /bin/gzip. This would be enough to unpack archives for > diskless systems. The other is to use /rescue/tar and /rescue/gzip. > > Currently /rescue uses gtar, however, this will likely be switched to > bsdtar after 5.3-RELEASE (see PR bin/72549). This will add cpio and pax > support to /rescue/tar (in addition to saving approx. 40k). I don't > believe using /rescue is the correct solution for diskless systems. > > Which is why I propose moving gzip to /bin. This would increase /bin by > about 46k. However, upon removing /stand the net would be a savings in > the root partition. /bin/pax and gzip are capable of handling the > diskless template archives and will also be updated as part of world to > receive any bugfixes. > > If people agree with this, after providing patches for moving gzip to > /bin I plan on addressing sysinstall to have /stand removed as part of > the post-install cleanup/configuration. And then after I'd like to work > on bringing our support and instructions for diskless environments up to > date with 5.X. > > Anyone have any thoughts, objections, feelings on this? If anyone has > already started work on this but doesn't have the time let me know and > I'd be happy to pick up where they left off. Otherwise I'm willing to > put in the grunt work if anyone is willing to help commit it once > 5.3-release is out of the way. > I think that this is generally a good idea. On a larger scale I'd like to see the disc1 installer become a full live filesystem so that stand isn't needed at all. Any interest in helping with that? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4172AC60.2020405>