Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:16:00 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.bawue.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/asmutils Makefile distinfo pkg-descr Message-ID: <20051130141600.GB79912@voodoo.bawue.com> In-Reply-To: <20051130140838.GA49598@FreeBSD.org> References: <200511301349.jAUDnfoO032739@repoman.freebsd.org> <1133358970.85111.16.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20051130140838.GA49598@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 02:08:38PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > What's so filthy about mkdirs? I personally enjoy seeing them in the > > typescripts. > > I agree there's a fair amount of controversy with muting mkdir's. Back > when I started porting things, I've observed that most ports actually > muted those, so I followed that style. Since there's no general rule > right, I felt like keeping my ports consistent WRT this. Again, I must > say that I would be rather pleased if we'd finally come to an agreement, > with appropriate sentence in Porter Handbook. You wanna get an entry in PH whether to mute or not MKDIR's ? It just smells like another-useless-policy-request. It's just a matter of taste if you want to hide dirs creation or not. -Kirill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051130141600.GB79912>