Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:44:28 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: "Justin C.Walker" <justin@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Frustrating network problem - need diagnotic help Message-ID: <20010827104428.C475@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20010827171808.LXNV29510.femail39.sdc1.sfba.home.com@grinch>; from justin@mac.com on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 10:18:07AM -0700 References: <200108271707.f7RH73R23446@ptavv.es.net> <20010827171808.LXNV29510.femail39.sdc1.sfba.home.com@grinch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 10:18:07AM -0700, Justin C.Walker wrote: > To be pedantic, (my copy of) the spec sez that bit 0 of the source > is wired to zero. You can figure that any way you want, but the > implication is that you can't send a frame with the 'group address' > bit set from a conforming transmitter. Ok, like I said, my copy is at the other end of my daily commute. > To be even more pedantic, isn't "the second bit" mask 0x2 (from the > preceding poster)? On the wire, or in the spec? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010827104428.C475>