Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:48:31 mst7mst From: "Duke Normandin" <01031149@3web.net> To: igorr@crosswinds.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.3R <--> win95 Message-ID: <20001125014006.A460737B4D7@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 Nov 00 at 10:44, Igor' Robul' wrote: >Hello, Duke > >On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:42:50PM +0000, Duke Normandin wrote: >> I want the following: >> 3.3R <x-over> win95 <dial-up> ISP >> >> I *have* to use win95 to connect to my ISP. Win95 won't route so I'm >> pooched as far as connecting to my ISP from the FBSD box - I think. >> >> So, for the moment, all I want is an ethernet connection between the two >> boxes. Should I disable tun0 in rc.conf? Can't the "lo0, tun0 and ep0 >> co-exist? I thought that "routed" was suppose to do just that. What >Disable tun0. You don't need it. >Also, make sure you have made correct crossover. The crossover custom (professionally) made and pre-tested. So I'm relying on that. Do I comment out the following in rc.conf to disable tun0:? if_config_tun0="" and remove tun0 from the following:? network_interface="lo0 tun0 ep0" Why would I *have* to do that? What if I wanted to use a modem on tun0 *and* ep0 for my LAN? Should I not be able to use both, with ppp "bound" to tun0 only, or does ppp drive the packets on ethernet as well? I'm so confused, I wouldn't know sh*t from Shine-Olla anymore ;,) Thanks... -duke Calgary,Alberta, Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001125014006.A460737B4D7>