Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:01:52 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <20061213210116.P26879@ns1.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <4580D3BB.7060504@samsco.org> References: <200612140357.kBE3vY0Q053458@repoman.freebsd.org> <4580CD6A.5090802@samsco.org> <20061213201031.T26658@ns1.feral.com> <4580D3BB.7060504@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> There wasn't a full switchover to SMP at 6.0 because an SMP kernel on a > UP system incurs a measurable runtime overhead, and we wanted to present > a system that showed the best of FreeBSD to people who wanted to run it But David's point is that most AMD64 boxes *are* SMP, not UP. Is that wrong?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061213210116.P26879>