Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:06:31 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make Makefile Message-ID: <20010315140631.B50446@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200103152109.f2FL9S925102@harmony.village.org>; from imp@harmony.village.org on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 02:09:28PM -0700 References: <20010315150231.B362@elvis.mu.org> <200103151033.f2FAX1q89921@freefall.freebsd.org> <200103151656.f2FGuF923193@harmony.village.org> <20010315150231.B362@elvis.mu.org> <200103152109.f2FL9S925102@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 02:09:28PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> Recent discussions tend to point out that MAINTAINER has gone badly
> awry and that asserting MAINTAINERship as anything like an exclusive
> lock should only be done in rare instances (new code, code being
> maintained out, complex code people have a history of breaking).
So which of the above reasons was used to bop ru on the head for his
atacontrol commit? Non apply. Thus no one should have said anything to
him.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010315140631.B50446>