Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/44311 IPFW2 broken in recent 4.7-STABLE?? Message-ID: <200210202140.g9KLe2EY029813@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/44311; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, tom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/44311 IPFW2 broken in recent 4.7-STABLE?? Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 17:28:34 -0400 At 2:19 PM -0700 2002/10/20, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:14:03PM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: >> Ah, then this is a bug against the man page, which provides >> instructions for getting IPFW2 in STABLE without mentioning the >> kernel change: >> >> > ipfw2 is standard in FreeBSD CURRENT, whereas FreeBSD >>STABLE still uses >> > ipfw1 unless the kernel is compiled with options IPFW2, and >>/sbin/ipfw > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >it does mention the kernel change. But the wording is unclear -- I thought IPFW2=TRUE made all necessary changes, including the kernel change, and I've read that para multiple times. Chris Pepper > cheers > luigi > >> > and /usr/lib/libalias are recompiled with -DIPFW2 and >>reinstalled (the >> > same effect can be achieved by adding IPFW2=TRUE to >>/etc/make.conf before >> > a buildworld). >> >> I will back off to IPFW1 for now if >> src/sys/modules/ipfw/Makefile isn't going to be able to build IPFW2 >> with STABLE GENERIC -- I prefer to stick with GENERIC and modules. -- Chris Pepper: <http://www.reppep.com/~pepper/>; Rockefeller University: <http://www.rockefeller.edu/>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210202140.g9KLe2EY029813>