Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:46:35 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> To: Johan van Selst <johans@freebsd.org> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: texi2html problem Message-ID: <CADL2u4iSJf_4eT%2BLEL8aWt1Kr=-yXtM0fKfzpXw764=dD2--zQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120709082759.GA46487@mud.stack.nl> References: <4FFA3A36.9050809@dougbarton.us> <20120709073419.GA37825@mud.stack.nl> <4FFA8A8A.7040205@dougbarton.us> <20120709082759.GA46487@mud.stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/7/9 Johan van Selst <johans@freebsd.org>: > Doug Barton wrote: >> >> It would also be useful if you could make real options out of >> >> what you have in the file already. >> > Not sure what you mean by this: the options seem real enough. >> make config >> =3D=3D=3D> No options to configure > > The only relevant options are DOCS and NLS; they were never included in > OPTIONS in the past (before I adopted this port). And indeed, many ports > don't include DOCS and NLS in their OPTIONS today. My understanding is > that most people who want to tweak these specific settings use a > system-wide setting anyway. > > Is there some general policy on whether OPTIONS_DEFINE should be set for > DOCS and NLS as well? > As far as I understand you have to include DOCS, NLS, and EXAMPLES in OPTIONS_DEFINE if your port uses them, but they are automatically set if not overridden. Ren=E9
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADL2u4iSJf_4eT%2BLEL8aWt1Kr=-yXtM0fKfzpXw764=dD2--zQ>