Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:26:19 +0200
From:      "Marcel Grandemange" <thavinci@thavinci.za.net>
To:        "'Tsu-Fan Cheng'" <tfcheng@gmail.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: ZFS Recovery Tools
Message-ID:  <02e401c94b56$a1d12a00$e5737e00$@za.net>
In-Reply-To: <f84c38580811201255o1a207f97u8cb4078d03911fa9@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <02c801c94b40$4b6a2f10$e23e8d30$@za.net>	 <20081120204756.O16829@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <f84c38580811201255o1a207f97u8cb4078d03911fa9@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Hi,
>  I was just reading stuff about ZFS, and wonder if it would be
>beneficial for me to use it. I store a lots of multimedia files in my
>HD, they usually have the size of > 1GB (e.g. 1.2, 1.7 or even
>bigger), and my system is running UFS.
>  so can I buy a new HD, say 500GB, and format it ZFS style and use it
>along with other UFS? and will ZFS performs better than UFS in my
>situation? Thank you!!


Correct me if im wrong but zfs seems way to experimental and unstable
according to what I have found on net so far.
FYI - I decided to use UFS in mean while, but for those interested in why I
say this...

http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSKnownProblems

I share other NB server roles with my file server and cannot afford lockups
etc...

Please anyone correct me if im wrong!

>TFC

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Wojciech Puchar
<wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>> all the input from various users I assume zfs would be the file system of
>> choice for such large volumes?
>>
>> Are there limitations or downsides using UFS on such a large volume?
>
> no, unless you will create it with default options.
>
> use -i big-power-of-two simply to have enough inodes for your files, but
not
> 100 times too much. too much inodes=more wasted space AND VERY SLOW FSCK
>
> use -b 32768 or 65536 depending of your file's average size.
>
> -b 16384 will work too, but again fsck may be long.
>
>
> of course turn on softupdates.
>
> UFS performs excellent on large drives/volumes. not in theory but in
> practice, i use it every place, on volumes up to 3GB
>
> NO PROBLEMS.
>
>
>> Also are there any tools for recovery off ZFS volumes? Accidental
>> delete/format/corruption...?
>
> no.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>

__________ NOD32 3628 (20081120) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02e401c94b56$a1d12a00$e5737e00$>