Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:12:21 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To:        Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Updating from 4.9-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <20040125110630.F81485@carver.gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040121141952.GA17839@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
References:  <BAY13-F22q5xVz5WkmR00000eff@hotmail.com> <1074659659.28370.10.camel@athena> <20040121141952.GA17839@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Ken Smith wrote:

> If I am remembering that right don't the statfs issues break that,
> or at least make it something not to be attempted by mere mortals
> and perhaps worth a mention in UPDATING?

Its in UPDATING on -CURRENT.  I guess we need to explicitly warn people to
read the -CURRENT UPDATING and not the -STABLE one when planning their
upgrade.

This is in -CURRENT UPDATING:

       ****************************DANGER*******************************

        DO NOT make installworld after the buildworld w/o building and
        installing a new kernel FIRST.  You will be unable to build a
        new kernel otherwise on a system with new binaries and an old
        kernel.

Also see the section "To upgrade in-place from 4.x-stable to current" near
the bottom of the file.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040125110630.F81485>