Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:43:46 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regarding portscout Message-ID: <CAGwOe2ZmOj8bcgC2MtwsQv94UBp1CUR=E_FFa_APu_MT9c-dAQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130114174008.GF8239@home.opsec.eu> References: <CAGwOe2bN_yKytaUYWtc-G0wVkfTZDwHZj8U8ESoeWPAnwhp11A@mail.gmail.com> <20130114174008.GF8239@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> wrote: > Hi! > >> In this case, should a maintainer wait until the previous PR is taken >> care of? I didn't read information regarding this in the handbook. > > The maintainer should not wait for the previous PR. He can update his PR > with a new patch for the new version, so that the committer can just > commit the newer patch. Understood. Thanks. > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 7 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2ZmOj8bcgC2MtwsQv94UBp1CUR=E_FFa_APu_MT9c-dAQ>