Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:58:39 -0700 From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion Message-ID: <1090619918.2748.48.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <4101872E.9020604@centtech.com> References: <1090609869.2748.23.camel@leguin> <4101839D.6030108@centtech.com> <1090619066.2748.46.camel@leguin> <4101872E.9020604@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 14:46, Eric Anderson wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > >On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 14:31, Eric Anderson wrote: > > > > > >>Eric Anholt wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>OK, the final version of the X.Org conversion patch has hit the tree. > >>>No ports appear to be broken by the upgrade at this time. X.Org has > >>>been made the default X distribution on -current. Other versions of > >>>FreeBSD retain the same default X distribution (XFree86) but can upgrade > >>>by setting X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg in /etc/make.conf. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Sorry if I'm in the stone age here, but I why is this better than > >>XFree86? Just curious. > >> > >> > > > >It's newer than our old XFree86 4.3 and supports far more hardware. > >It's also where current X developers are working, so it's where new > >features will be first. It also doesn't have the new XFree86 license. > >You could read xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/CHANGELOG and xc/ChangeLog > >to see what actually changed. (Hint: a lot.) > > > > Cool! So I can expect all the same stuff that works in the -snap > version (4.3.99 I think?) of XFree86 to work on X.Org stuff? In Yes, and more. The snap is quite out of date. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1090619918.2748.48.camel>