Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:31:50 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Subject: Re: 7+ days of dogfood Message-ID: <20130210173150.GA77296@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmonpe8A0HpQbP_8Qd_fo7m8U0d-iSdjk130dAAdoB=Ozbg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130210000723.GA73630@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5117A319.60804@passap.ru> <20130210164424.GA77092@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAJ-Vmonpe8A0HpQbP_8Qd_fo7m8U0d-iSdjk130dAAdoB=Ozbg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:05:22AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 10 February 2013 08:44, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > Without it, the build infrastructure was selecting -march=i486, > > which produced even worse results. Several ports would not > > compile because llvm's integrated assembler was given invalid > > assembly constructs. > > Have you submitted bugs? :) > No. At the time, I was more concerned with returning my laptop to some functioning form than worrying about why building xfig was dying with an invalid assembly instruction. I also don't see a point in submitting a bug report of the form 'Firefox dies with a segfault after 10 seconds' when I can obtain no other useful information. In particular, bin/112408 suggests a bug report about firefox would be enshrined in the PR database. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130210173150.GA77296>