Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:02:05 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        deischen@freebsd.org, eischen@vigrid.com
Cc:        h@schmalzbauer.de
Subject:   Re: ports and -current
Message-ID:  <20030920.230205.88963117.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
References:  <20030920175306.Q9576@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
            Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes:
: I'd like to see some barking up the other tree.  Why should fixes
: to unbreak ports be held up by the freeze?

Because the ports folks do not want random changes going into the tree
right now given that they have enough build problems on 4.9 related to
GNOME.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030920.230205.88963117.imp>