Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:45:23 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> Cc: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man5 Makefile linsysfs.5 src/sys/compat/linsysfs linsysfs.c src/sys/conf files.amd64 files.i386 files.pc98 src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC NOTES src/sys/i386/conf NOTES src/sys/pc98/conf NOTES src/sys/modules ... Message-ID: <86d5elwz7w.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200605101356.k4ADupq7019647@ambrisko.com> (Doug Ambrisko's message of "Wed, 10 May 2006 06:56:51 -0700 (PDT)") References: <200605101356.k4ADupq7019647@ambrisko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > linsysfs has a dependency on procfs, but doesn't seem to use any > > procfs bits. is that intentional? > That probabably my confusion with what was in procfs versus psuedofs. > I cribbed most of the stuff from linprocfs. So it is intentional. linprocfs has a dependency on procfs because it duplicates parts of procfs (files with the same content but different names). I can see no such overlap in linsysfs, so the dependency should be removed. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86d5elwz7w.fsf>