Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:15:25 +1000 From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports and -current Message-ID: <20030921051525.GA31537@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210106070.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20030920.204425.25098720.imp@bsdimp.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210106070.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:15AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > But you seem to thing -pthread == NOOP unbreaks ports ;-) Warner might, but Kris doesn't. Kris is asking for the -pthread option to be restored to let -current users breath easy while the task of updating the ports goes on. Then he's happy for it to become a noop. I susect theat this puts much of the work on a few people rather than many. I hope it doesn't require a volley of emails to each port maintainer to resolve each one. People have jumped off buildings for less than that! -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030921051525.GA31537>