Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:13:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: h@schmalzbauer.de Subject: Re: ports and -current Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210110000.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030920.230205.88963117.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> > Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes: > : I'd like to see some barking up the other tree. Why should fixes > : to unbreak ports be held up by the freeze? > > Because the ports folks do not want random changes going into the tree > right now given that they have enough build problems on 4.9 related to > GNOME. Oddly enough, the GNOME ports are supposedly pretty much PTHREAD_LIBS compliant. It's really the KDE ports that have the brunt of the problems. Oh, yeah, and they just updated QT and KDE to the latest releases. I suppose that's OK, but committing fixes to unbreak them on -current isn't. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210110000.26520-100000>