Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:49:51 +0200
From:      Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz>
To:        Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: mount(8) mount_union(8) and the slippery wet floor...
Message-ID:  <20020905144950.GM10717@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20020905144627.GL10717@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
References:  <5.1.0.14.0.20020904132723.00bc28e8@mail.lusidor.nu> <20020904124832.GA15994@submonkey.net> <44y9ahecn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20020905091754.GE10717@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <44bs7c1phq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20020905144627.GL10717@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# neuhauser@bellavista.cz / 2002-09-05 16:46:28 +0200:
> # freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com / 2002-09-05 10:26:57 -0400:
> > Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> writes:
> > > # freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com / 2002-09-04 16:13:53 -0400:
> > > > For the record, they are *not* the same thing.
> > > 
> > >     could you elaborate?
> > 
> > I'm not 100% sure that I completely understand the technical details,
> > but I'll give it a shot.  You could go check the archives of the
> > freebsd-fs list for more authoritative information on the subject.
> > 
> > Very briefly, they implement similar functionality through different
> > abstractions.  mount_union is a filesystem in its own right -- it
> > "stacks" on top of other filesystem types and uses their capabilities
> > to perform the I/O operations, but to the system I/O code, it looks
> > like a filesystem.  The union mount option is visible at a higher
> > level; the filesystem code itself doesn't know about the shadowing.
> > 
> > Or something like that.  At any rate, they don't seem to share any
> > code. 
> 
>     this is interesting. I always thought that mount(8) works by
>     invoking mount_whatever(8) where whatever is determined by the value
>     passed in the -t option to mount(8). looks like this isn't the case,
>     then... hm: 

    aargh, sorry for talking out of my ass. I didn't realize I was
    confusing -o union with -t union.

    sorry!

-- 
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE
4:48PM up 15 days, 22:41, 7 users, load averages: 0.07, 0.03, 0.00
end

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020905144950.GM10717>