Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:30:51 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: svn commit: r252608 - in head: include lib/libc/stdlib Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041627360.2446@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <51D55FC5.7040703@freebsd.org> References: <201307032121.r63LLtkk022011@svn.freebsd.org> <20130704120336.G1176@besplex.bde.org> <51D4ED7F.5050800@freebsd.org> <20130704142324.K1670@besplex.bde.org> <51D55FC5.7040703@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >> We already pass that moment in the past, changing old&bad formula with > >> new one which cause the same effect: non-repeating sequence in the very > >> global scope. We already agree that repeating depends on something like > >> OS release numbers. I can't find that discussion right now. > > > > But you are changing it in between releases. > > Development and stable branches are not official releases. sorry for nitpicking: ther is quite large difference between official/unofficial status and users/vendors expectations regarding interface/APIs stability. development (aka -current or head/) is not, while stable (aka stable/*/) are, ate least they are great subject to POLA. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041627360.2446>