Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 11:47:36 +0200 From: bsd@perimeter.co.za To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: FreeBSD Question List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /usr/ports/lang/ruby Message-ID: <courier.3F3371B9.000028B9@perimeter.co.za> In-Reply-To: <20030808094220.GA98568@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <courier.3F3364AF.000004AB@perimeter.co.za> <20030808091546.GA98440@rot13.obsecurity.org> <courier.3F336F17.00000B91@perimeter.co.za> <20030808094220.GA98568@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway writes: >> And I'm curious about dependencies. For example, portupgrade's own version >> has not changed, and 'pkg_info -r portupgrade*' still shows >> ruby-1.6.8.2003.04.19 as required. > > Yes, as it should. The port has not been upgraded, it has only moved > location. The next time it is upgraded, portupgrade will follow the > entry in the MOVED file to the new location, and everything will > continue to be just fine :) > > Kris Aaahh! - she be very pretty! OK - so I should learn a little patience (like my mother always told me - something about a virtue.....) and in due course the tango will be completed. Thanks for taking the time out for me Kris. Regards, Patrick.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?courier.3F3371B9.000028B9>